Free Essays on Into The Wild

Relevancy of Life and Death At the beginning of reading â€Å"Into the Wild†, the more I read the more I started to question whether Chris McCandless was wrong for doing what he did. Primarily the issue at hand to me with this entire story is whether Chris McCandless’s actions are relative or not? Ultimately Chris was a product of the stereotypical life many teenagers live today. McCandless grew up with good parents that cared for him and his future. Chris also had a younger sister to which he was close to. As they grew up, it was noticeable that Chris was academically sound. He goes through everything that is common today in society: the public school system and not to mention college only to portray an unfortunate early death. Further into the book, the first thing I asked myself was, â€Å"How could this kid have gone through all the crap that is supposed to somehow secure a prosperous future, and then in the end, wind up dead from starvation?† At the time I felt his death was self educed. I mean surely it is reasonable to believe that if someone has the intelligence to go through all the prescribed nonsense in society and come out with a GPA of 3.73, that this individual will somehow achieve some form of success in their life. Chris McCandless got through everything and basically tossed it out the window because he had realized that it wasn’t for him. He was a product of the system Chris, in the end, rejected. First off, I did not really believe McCandless’s actions were relevant, merely because I was not fully aware of his purpose. The reason I was not sure is because all I knew at first was that his journey is what killed him. So in the beginning, I definitely assumed that n o matter what I was going to read, in the end, I still would believe his journey wasn’t worth it. The reason I say this, is merely because you can’t deny the fact that if he wouldn’t have gone on this extremely ill prepared journey... Free Essays on Into The Wild Free Essays on Into The Wild Relevancy of Life and Death At the beginning of reading â€Å"Into the Wild†, the more I read the more I started to question whether Chris McCandless was wrong for doing what he did. Primarily the issue at hand to me with this entire story is whether Chris McCandless’s actions are relative or not? Ultimately Chris was a product of the stereotypical life many teenagers live today. McCandless grew up with good parents that cared for him and his future. Chris also had a younger sister to which he was close to. As they grew up, it was noticeable that Chris was academically sound. He goes through everything that is common today in society: the public school system and not to mention college only to portray an unfortunate early death. Further into the book, the first thing I asked myself was, â€Å"How could this kid have gone through all the crap that is supposed to somehow secure a prosperous future, and then in the end, wind up dead from starvation?† At the time I felt his death was self educed. I mean surely it is reasonable to believe that if someone has the intelligence to go through all the prescribed nonsense in society and come out with a GPA of 3.73, that this individual will somehow achieve some form of success in their life. Chris McCandless got through everything and basically tossed it out the window because he had realized that it wasn’t for him. He was a product of the system Chris, in the end, rejected. First off, I did not really believe McCandless’s actions were relevant, merely because I was not fully aware of his purpose. The reason I was not sure is because all I knew at first was that his journey is what killed him. So in the beginning, I definitely assumed that n o matter what I was going to read, in the end, I still would believe his journey wasn’t worth it. The reason I say this, is merely because you can’t deny the fact that if he wouldn’t have gone on this extremely ill prepared journey... Free Essays on Into The Wild Chris McCandless was a passionate youth searching for something. His humdrum existence, Krakauer suggests, encouraged McCandless’s entry into the wild- not just to escape from civilization but to discover himself. Of his readings, McCandless enjoyed Tolstoy, London, and Thoreau so much that he highlighted many of their passages in his books. They were calling him. The comforts of every day life were not satisfying his need for adventure and enlightenment. McCandless felt concern and displacement with the disposition of our world and wanted to rid himself of it for a while. Maybe his step into the wilderness was an attempted mission to improve civilization- â€Å"his need for a purpose.† Civilization did not have a place for him- surely the arms of nature would greet him with enthusiasm. McCandless entered the extreme Alaskan trail, crowning Jack London as king. His arrival and stay was to evoke clarity, without authority and without the advancement of technology. The philosophy McCandless took was that every day should be different, a new adventure. In a letter to Ron Franz, McCandless assures Franz, â€Å"If you want to get more out of life, Ron, you must lose your inclination for monotonous security...The very basic core of man’s living spirit is his passion for adventure. The joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences...† Not only did McCandless experience new terrain along with its beauty, but he encountered many people. Many lives were altered just crossing the path of McCandless. Krakauer’s life was changed; he felt a connection with McCandless after he reported on the boy’s demise. He identified with McCandless as the two shared an intense odyssey in which their problems didn’t magically disappear but instead they came closer to understanding themselves. Each was uncovering his soul whereas most individuals are happy being ignorant. Instead of risking their securities so... Free Essays on Into The Wild Exploratory Essay By Kristy Gates When I first started reading â€Å"Into the Wild,† I thought to myself, â€Å"Why exactly is this boy leaving everything that he knew and loved to go on this journey?† Put himself in complete danger by hitchhiking his way ALONE to Alaska. He gave up all of his possessions and the $25,000 that he had saved up to charity. What was the point? In the end, it shows that the only way that this story could’ve turned out, was him lying dead and decomposing and found by a moose hunter. How else could the story have turned out besides that way? McCandless had nothing. Nothing at all, nothing to support himself in any way whatsoever. In the beginning of this book, there is an author’s note, basically telling everyone the story plot and what will, in the end, happen to this young man on his way to â€Å"living off the wild.† It tells his real name, Christopher Johnson McCandless, also, it tells that he had given $25,000 in saving to charity, abandoned his car and most of his possessions, burned all the cash in his wallet, and invented a new life for himself. Chris McCandless came from what most people would like to call a â€Å"well-to-do† family on the East Coast. The boy was probably no more than 19 years old, but was on his way to a life of his own by hitchhiking to Alaska into the wilderness. He graduated from Emory University in the summer of 1990, but shortly afterwards; McCandless was not seen for quite some time by his family and peers. He had invented a new life for himself by now wandering across North America in search of himself. His family had no idea where he was or even where to start looking. McCandless was a stubborn young man and did not mesh well with what was considered modern society. He was captivated by the writings of Leo Tolstoy. He admired how the great novelist had a life of wealth and privilege. Chris McCandless was out in the wilderness for sixteen weeks. In the end, ...